Friday, October 20, 2006
 

I just heard of the Object Test Bench in Visual Studio 2005 (in Kevin Hammond's blog), and hurried to use it, but ran into a small problem, in that the context menu off the class diagram I don't have a "Create Instance" item!  Am I perhaps doing something wrong, or is this OTB tool only available in a higher version of VS2005 (I'm running VS2005 Professional)? 

Here's a picture of what I get, which does NOT include the Create Instance:

Anybody with any clue is invited to comment...


Geek Speak
10/20/2006 12:45:55 AM UTC  #    Comments [2]Trackback

Wednesday, October 18, 2006
 

Learning new things is almost always fun, and one must try to check one's assumptions at the door.  However, what if your brain assumes something and doesn't come right out and say so?  That's interesting.

Keeping in mind that I am new to ASP.NET 2.0...

I'm experimenting, and here I have a neat little master page with a hidden field on it that I want all the other pages to use, so one page puts data in the field and then transfers control to the next page.  The next page then checks that hidden field and doesn't find anything.  This had me wondering what the darned problem was, until suddenly it occurred to me how on earth I could expect anything to be there?  The master page is not stateful, and it is generated from scratch each time.  Doh!  Somehow it had gotten into my head that the master page was some sort of repository -- despite the fact that I know there is no state preservation or information passing beyond query strings, forms, and session/application variables.  Amazing what assumptions one can make with no justification whatsoever and contrary information and experience in rich abundance from past encounters.  Makes me feel like I just called up customer support with the complaint that my computer's cup holder had broken. 

Doh!


Geek Speak
10/18/2006 9:06:34 PM UTC  #    Comments [0]Trackback

Tuesday, September 26, 2006
 

Rory Blyth.  Neopoleon.  He's a geeky Microsoft guy who was formerly with the Microsoft MSDN Events team, and he was going on about leaving, possibly even leaving Microsoft, and finally the shoe dropped and <whew>, he's not leaving Microsoft, just moving to a different part of Microsoft.  Still part of Developer communications, but in the heart of The Beast, in Redmond itself.  He's joining the Channel 9 team.  Here's his "Exit Interview", so called:

http://channel9.msdn.com/showpost.aspx?postid=237876

 


Geek Speak
9/26/2006 5:13:17 PM UTC  #    Comments [0]Trackback

Sunday, September 10, 2006
 

I've been sick with a sore throat and other neat cold symptoms, but then I went and took a dose of a generic "Day-Quill" preparation.  Sure, it don't put you to sleep, but it definitely can make you dizzy at times.




9/10/2006 3:25:43 PM UTC  #    Comments [0]Trackback

I find myself astonished sometimes about various things.  One of them was a blog entry by Bible Belt Blogger Frank Lockwood:
On a trip to Mormon Country (Sep. 8, 2006), the head of the National Association of Evangelicals branded the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as a "cult", but said he might vote for a Mormon presidential candidate in 2008.
Ted Haggard, NAE president and the pastor of a Colorado Springs megachurch, said Mormons and evangelicals don't agree on spiritual matters even though they have similar political agendas.
"The Mormon church aligns with us on pro-life issues and the Mormon church aligns with us on many of the social issues," Haggard said in an interview. "Now where we would take pause is, we believe Mormonism is a Christian cult."

The first thing that jumps out at me is the description of "Mormonism" as a "Christian cult."  Wow!  Check it out!  Up until now I have heard us described as a "cult" frequently enough, but this Haggard fellow has actually allowed the adjective Christian to be applied as a descriptive to the word "cult" when applied to the LDS church! 

So, we might be a "cult" to them, but at least we're a "Christian cult".  Oh, my, how we have come up in the world. 




9/10/2006 3:02:40 PM UTC  #    Comments [0]Trackback

Saturday, September 02, 2006
 

How many people know who Mitt Romney is?  I have no idea, but my brother, the Republican, didn't know when I asked him a couple of weeks ago.  In no particular order, then, this is Mitt Romney:

  • current governor of the State of Massachusetts
  • a Republican
  • Rescued the Salt Lake Olympics from bankruptcy
  • a Mormon
Mitt is a lot of other things, of course, but one other very important thing about him is that he is seriously considering a run for the United States Presidency.

Yep, you heard me right.  A Mormon wants to be President.  Cue laugh track.

I wish I had time to pontificate on this, but I don't.  One thing of importance is, however, how will Mitt fare with "born again" Christian Evangelicals?  Mormons are not even considered to be Christians by these people.  Some extremists in the Ev movement are even openly hostile to Mormons, especially Mormon missionaries.  The father-in-law of one of my sons is a evangelical minister, and he told my son that when he passes Mormon missionaries walking on the street he has a powerful urge to swerve his car to run them over.  So how could a Mormon win in the deep South, in the Bible Belt?

Just in case you don't know this, I am also a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, so be aware this issue of a Mormon running for President is an issue of great interest to me.  I would definitely vote for Mitt.

Keep in mind, however, that if the current US Senate majority leader, also a Mormon, were to run for President, there is no way on earth I would vote for him.  He's a Democrat (not an automatic disqualification in my view), but most importantly he is a liberal nutcase.  In my not so humble opinion, at least.

Anyway, here are some links related to Mitt Romney's candidacy:

An "unofficial" (I guess) pro-Mitt website:
http://www.runmittrun.org

An Evangelical Christian pro-Mitt website:
http://www.evangelicalsformitt.org/
Maybe things aren't hopeless after all...

An American Spectator article on the subject:
http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10274

Politics
9/2/2006 4:38:34 AM UTC  #    Comments [0]Trackback

Tuesday, August 29, 2006
 

Here I thought I could trust news agencies, sort of, at least, but apparently they have sordid agendas just like many politicians.  I shall say no more than, check this out:

http://www.zombietime.com/reuters_photo_fraud/


8/29/2006 6:19:45 AM UTC  #    Comments [0]Trackback

Monday, August 28, 2006
 

The International Astrophysical Union has demoted Pluto from the status of "planet" to that of a mere "dwarf planet".  How sad, too bad -- but what of it?  It's not like Pluto loses its retirement plan, after all.  It was, and remains, an iceball floating around out there in the depths of the solar system, accompanied by its sad coterie of fellow iceballs Charon, Nix and Hydra (all so-called "moons" of Pluto discovered in 1978 (Charon) and 2005 (Nix and Hydra).  See this link for a family photo of the group (taken by the Hubble space telescope).

So now we only have 8 planets in the Solar System!  Questions on astronomy tests must be revised slightly, of course, but the ultimate effect of Pluto's demotion is minor and cleans up at least one sticky question, which is why bodies such as earth's moon and UB-313, which are larger than Pluto, aren't to be considered planets, too. 

It neatens up the Solar System and I, at least, say "good riddance" to planet Pluto.  I shan't miss the old iceball.


8/28/2006 3:15:20 PM UTC  #    Comments [0]Trackback

Saturday, August 05, 2006
 

After leaving work yesterday afternoon, I drove the usual route down Capitol Blvd to Trosper, from where I took the turn to get on the freeway northbound.  An older Plymouth Fury was in front of me, and the first car in the lane for left-turning onto the freeway.  The light changed and I followed the Fury left and we drove towards the onramp.  On the sidewalk that goes down Trosper and crosses the start of the onramp there was a bicyclist, a middle-aged guy riding slowly towards the crossing.  He's got a cell phone pressed up against his left ear and he's yakking away, apparently oblivious to the world around him.  The Fury proceeds towards the onramp, beginning to accelerate, and just a bit before it gets there, without the slightest glance to his left (self-preservation is so overrated, you know) the cyclist turns into the pedestrian crossing, the cellphone still glued to his ear, still yakking away.  The Fury's driver reacts late to this bit of insanity, but finally slams on the brakes, just as the cyclist is moseying directly into her path.

So here I am, applying the brakes myself as I watch the Fury and the cyclist begin their rendezvous.  The thought rushes through my mind that I am about to witness a bicyclist get creamed by a car.  Front-row seating!  Wow.

Fortunately, with the screech of tires the Fury manages to stop before the bicyclist becomes a hood ornament.  The cyclist continues on with his ear glued to the phone, contentedly motormouthing along, either pretending nothing had just happened or truly oblivious.

The lessons here are obvious.  For cell phone users, WATCH THE HECK WHAT YOU'RE DOING!  For drivers, expect the unexpected when you see a person near your path who has a cell phone glued to his or her ear.

 



8/5/2006 12:16:32 AM UTC  #    Comments [0]Trackback