<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Mike Clark's Blog</title>
    <link>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/</link>
    <description>A Geek in Time</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Mike Clark</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 04:37:03 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 1.8.5223.2</generator>
    <managingEditor>mike@clarkmichael.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>mike@clarkmichael.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=a0207504-67d0-428b-a8ce-3f136f2c0c91</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/PermaLink,guid,a0207504-67d0-428b-a8ce-3f136f2c0c91.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>mike@clarkmichael.com (Mike)</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/CommentView,guid,a0207504-67d0-428b-a8ce-3f136f2c0c91.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=a0207504-67d0-428b-a8ce-3f136f2c0c91</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      There's indications that the performance of President Obama and the Democrats is not
      being looked on very favorably by the electorate at large.  If things continue
      as they have been moving so far, the Democrats may very well be swept from power in
      both the House and Senate.  Mind-boggling.  The only thing that looks similar
      to this in the past (in MY memory at least), is the sweeping from power of the Republicans
      in Reagan's second half-term.  Except that the Republicans only held the
      Senate at the time (I hope I'm remembering this correctly).  
   </p>
        <p>
      See <a href="http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/democrats-259908-percent-republican.html">Michael
      Barone's article</a> in the OC Register.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.clarkmichael.com/aggbug.ashx?id=a0207504-67d0-428b-a8ce-3f136f2c0c91" />
      </body>
      <title>Are We About to See a Sea Change in US Politics?</title>
      <guid>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/PermaLink,guid,a0207504-67d0-428b-a8ce-3f136f2c0c91.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/Are+We+About+To+See+A+Sea+Change+In+US+Politics.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 04:37:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   There's indications that the performance of President Obama and the Democrats is not
   being looked on very favorably by the electorate at large.&amp;nbsp; If things continue
   as they have been moving so far, the Democrats may very well be swept from power in
   both the House and Senate.&amp;nbsp; Mind-boggling.&amp;nbsp; The only thing that looks similar
   to this in the past (in MY memory at least), is the sweeping from power of the Republicans
   in Reagan's&amp;nbsp;second half-term.&amp;nbsp; Except that the Republicans only held the
   Senate at the time (I hope I'm remembering this correctly).&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   See &lt;a href="http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/democrats-259908-percent-republican.html"&gt;Michael
   Barone's article&lt;/a&gt; in the OC Register.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.clarkmichael.com/aggbug.ashx?id=a0207504-67d0-428b-a8ce-3f136f2c0c91" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/CommentView,guid,a0207504-67d0-428b-a8ce-3f136f2c0c91.aspx</comments>
      <category>Politics</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=8903f1c2-42f6-4720-906b-5a9899c33d05</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/PermaLink,guid,8903f1c2-42f6-4720-906b-5a9899c33d05.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>mike@clarkmichael.com (Mike)</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/CommentView,guid,8903f1c2-42f6-4720-906b-5a9899c33d05.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=8903f1c2-42f6-4720-906b-5a9899c33d05</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Yesterday, a Nigerian man named Abdulfarouk Umar Muttalab apparently attempted to
      destroy the aircraft he was riding in, by way of burning his lap off, except his device
      failed to work properly and his fellow passengers subdued him (they should have beat
      the crap out of him, but being Dutch, they were probably incredibly polite about it,
      mores the pity).
   </p>
        <p>
      That's one thing, but now the "authorities" have ratcheted up security precautions
      one or two more notches as a result. And we are definitely approproaching the ridiculous.
      My friend Paul Mehner (@paulmehner on Twitter) re-tweeted Rick Strahl (@RickStrahl)
      on the new rules and procedures being put into effect.
   </p>
        <p>
      Here's the Yahoo News report:
   </p>
        <p>
          <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Airline-passengers-see-apf-2678313752.html?x=0" target="_blank">http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Airline-passengers-see-apf-2678313752.html?x=0</a>
        </p>
        <blockquote>Passengers getting off flights from overseas reported being told that
   they couldn't get out of their seat for the last hour of their flight. Air Canada
   also said that during the last hour passengers won't be allowed access to carry-on
   baggage or to have any items on their laps.</blockquote>
        <p>
      I can see it coming. We will eventually be manacled into our seats for the entire
      flight. What, you need to use the lavatory, you terrorist? Just wait a moment while
      we unshackle you. And of course, our security officer, Bubba, will accompany you into
      the lav, to ensure you don't do anything funny.
   </p>
        <p>
      Because that is what's happening here. We have reached the point where we are all
      considered to be terrorists, by default. And we will be treated accordingly. As Rick
      Strahl points out, this is good training for sheepdom.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.clarkmichael.com/aggbug.ashx?id=8903f1c2-42f6-4720-906b-5a9899c33d05" />
      </body>
      <title>What's Next?  Will we be Manacled to our seats?</title>
      <guid>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/PermaLink,guid,8903f1c2-42f6-4720-906b-5a9899c33d05.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/Whats+Next++Will+We+Be+Manacled+To+Our+Seats.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:03:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Yesterday, a Nigerian man named Abdulfarouk Umar Muttalab apparently attempted to
   destroy the aircraft he was riding in, by way of burning his lap off, except his device
   failed to work properly and his fellow passengers subdued him (they should have beat
   the crap out of him, but being Dutch, they were probably incredibly polite about it,
   mores the pity).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   That's one thing, but now the "authorities" have ratcheted up security precautions
   one or two more notches as a result. And we are definitely approproaching the ridiculous.
   My friend Paul Mehner (@paulmehner on Twitter) re-tweeted Rick Strahl (@RickStrahl)
   on the new rules and procedures being put into effect.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Here's the Yahoo News report:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &lt;a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Airline-passengers-see-apf-2678313752.html?x=0" target="_blank"&gt;http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Airline-passengers-see-apf-2678313752.html?x=0&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Passengers getting off flights from overseas reported being told that
they couldn't get out of their seat for the last hour of their flight. Air Canada
also said that during the last hour passengers won't be allowed access to carry-on
baggage or to have any items on their laps.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
   I can see it coming. We will eventually be manacled into our seats for the entire
   flight. What, you need to use the lavatory, you terrorist? Just wait a moment while
   we unshackle you. And of course, our security officer, Bubba, will accompany you into
   the lav, to ensure you don't do anything funny.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Because that is what's happening here. We have reached the point where we are all
   considered to be terrorists, by default. And we will be treated accordingly. As Rick
   Strahl points out, this is good training for sheepdom.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.clarkmichael.com/aggbug.ashx?id=8903f1c2-42f6-4720-906b-5a9899c33d05" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/CommentView,guid,8903f1c2-42f6-4720-906b-5a9899c33d05.aspx</comments>
      <category>Politics</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=6c85e3b2-5134-4c87-b356-e70a36398ede</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/PermaLink,guid,6c85e3b2-5134-4c87-b356-e70a36398ede.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>mike@clarkmichael.com (Mike)</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/CommentView,guid,6c85e3b2-5134-4c87-b356-e70a36398ede.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=6c85e3b2-5134-4c87-b356-e70a36398ede</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
   How many people know who Mitt Romney is?  I have no idea, but my brother, the
   Republican, didn't know when I asked him a couple of weeks ago.  In no particular
   order, then, this is Mitt Romney:<br /><br /><ul><li>
         current governor of the State of Massachusetts</li><li>
         a Republican</li><li>
         Rescued the Salt Lake Olympics from bankruptcy</li><li>
         a Mormon</li></ul>
   Mitt is a lot of other things, of course, but one other very important thing about
   him is that he is seriously considering a run for the United States Presidency.<br /><br />
   Yep, you heard me right.  A Mormon wants to be President.  Cue laugh track.<br /><br />
   I wish I had time to pontificate on this, but I don't.  One thing of importance
   is, however, how will Mitt fare with "born again" Christian Evangelicals?  Mormons
   are not even considered to be Christians by these people.  Some extremists in
   the Ev movement are even openly hostile to Mormons, especially Mormon missionaries. 
   The father-in-law of one of my sons is a evangelical minister, and he told my son
   that when he passes Mormon missionaries walking on the street he has a powerful urge
   to swerve his car to run them over.  So how could a Mormon win in the deep South,
   in the Bible Belt?<br /><br />
   Just in case you don't know this, I am also a member of the Church of Jesus Christ
   of Latter-day Saints, so be aware this issue of a Mormon running for President is
   an issue of great interest to me.  I would definitely vote for Mitt.<br /><br />
   Keep in mind, however, that if the current US Senate majority leader, also a Mormon,
   were to run for President, there is no way on earth I would vote for him.  He's
   a Democrat (not an automatic disqualification in my view), but most importantly he
   is a liberal nutcase.  In my not so humble opinion, at least.<br /><br />
   Anyway, here are some links related to Mitt Romney's candidacy:<br /><br />
   An "unofficial" (I guess) pro-Mitt website:<br /><a href="http://www.runmittrun.org">http://www.runmittrun.org</a><br /><br />
   An Evangelical Christian pro-Mitt website:<br /><a href="http://www.evangelicalsformitt.org/">http://www.evangelicalsformitt.org/</a><br />
   Maybe things aren't hopeless after all...<br /><br />
   An American Spectator article on the subject:<br /><a href="http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10274">http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10274</a><br /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.clarkmichael.com/aggbug.ashx?id=6c85e3b2-5134-4c87-b356-e70a36398ede" /></body>
      <title>Mitt Romney</title>
      <guid>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/PermaLink,guid,6c85e3b2-5134-4c87-b356-e70a36398ede.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/Mitt+Romney.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 04:38:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
How many people know who Mitt Romney is?&amp;nbsp; I have no idea, but my brother, the
Republican, didn't know when I asked him a couple of weeks ago.&amp;nbsp; In no particular
order, then, this is Mitt Romney:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      current governor of the State of Massachusetts&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      a Republican&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      Rescued the Salt Lake Olympics from bankruptcy&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      a Mormon&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
Mitt is a lot of other things, of course, but one other very important thing about
him is that he is seriously considering a run for the United States Presidency.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Yep, you heard me right.&amp;nbsp; A Mormon wants to be President.&amp;nbsp; Cue laugh track.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I wish I had time to pontificate on this, but I don't.&amp;nbsp; One thing of importance
is, however, how will Mitt fare with "born again" Christian Evangelicals?&amp;nbsp; Mormons
are not even considered to be Christians by these people.&amp;nbsp; Some extremists in
the Ev movement are even openly hostile to Mormons, especially Mormon missionaries.&amp;nbsp;
The father-in-law of one of my sons is a evangelical minister, and he told my son
that when he passes Mormon missionaries walking on the street he has a powerful urge
to swerve his car to run them over.&amp;nbsp; So how could a Mormon win in the deep South,
in the Bible Belt?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Just in case you don't know this, I am also a member of the Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter-day Saints, so be aware this issue of a Mormon running for President is
an issue of great interest to me.&amp;nbsp; I would definitely vote for Mitt.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Keep in mind, however, that if the current US Senate majority leader, also a Mormon,
were to run for President, there is no way on earth I would vote for him.&amp;nbsp; He's
a Democrat (not an automatic disqualification in my view), but most importantly he
is a liberal nutcase.&amp;nbsp; In my not so humble opinion, at least.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Anyway, here are some links related to Mitt Romney's candidacy:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
An "unofficial" (I guess) pro-Mitt website:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.runmittrun.org"&gt;http://www.runmittrun.org&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
An Evangelical Christian pro-Mitt website:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.evangelicalsformitt.org/"&gt;http://www.evangelicalsformitt.org/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Maybe things aren't hopeless after all...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
An American Spectator article on the subject:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10274"&gt;http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10274&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.clarkmichael.com/aggbug.ashx?id=6c85e3b2-5134-4c87-b356-e70a36398ede" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.clarkmichael.com/CommentView,guid,6c85e3b2-5134-4c87-b356-e70a36398ede.aspx</comments>
      <category>Politics</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>